It is incomprehensible that...
...over 700 instances of timeframe overages have resulted in ZERO positives???????????????
Not only ZERO positives but ZERO positives for a whole host of noted substances that should have been readily/easily dectected??????
To me that dicates that either the published timeframes for the various substances must be way, way wrong or otherwise their current testing regime must be absolute CRAP...or both?
Also makes me wonder how many other Stables up there would have Vet Records that could stand up to the same level of scrutiny as that which has been applied in this case. I suspect, not very many.
Is that the faint whiff of burning Vet Records that I smell in the air? Perish the thought. :rolleyes: