No one is saying that Darrel is a liar... he gave a reason for her poor performance. But on paper and paper only, it looks like she was taken on and she got beat. I do not feel trainer reasons for defeats should be taken into account when deciding awards. While Darrel is a great, honest bloke, some trainers are not and I think it's a dangerous precedent to set if reasons for defeats are taken into account when deciding awards. I mean who do you know who is telling the truth or telling a story to bolster up award/credibility claims - you would need to decide this for each an every nominee! Way too much discretion IMHO! What if one of the panel didn't like you! I think it should be strictly who won what and who they beat, purely what is on paper. It's a shame that Forever Gold didn't travel but I'm sure you'll find that she would have acquitted herself very well if she did. (Hopefully next year). I also can't wait for a Courageous Annie v Forever Gold match up and hope it is a true run and fair race with nothing going amiss