Roll With Joe
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: I am SHOCKED !! The Russians accused of doping @ their own World Cup ?

  1. #1
    Member Gelding richard1955 will become famous soon enough
    Real Name
    richard ducharme
    Posts
    66

    I am SHOCKED !! The Russians accused of doping @ their own World Cup ?

    Imagine that ? Who would have thought such a thing ?

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-cu...lowing-hostss/

    Nobody "cheats" in sports, do they ? Certainly NOT in Horse Racing ?

    That just ain't cricket !!

    Opps... They do !

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-1...doping/9745780

    Probably are a few Harness Trainers that should be banned for life too ?

    https://harnessracingupdate.com/2017...ey-wants-know/

    We have raced against Rubber Duck. Did we have a "fair" chance ? The questions around certain "drugs" and horses/trainers is not simply the "level" of the PED that was in their blood ? but WHY certain drugs ( glaucine ) are in their system at all ?

    What "legit" medical reason was the drug "given" in the first place ? ( like the horse had a choice )

    OR was the drug (any pre-race drug) given to just make the horse "feel better" ie: race better ?

    Blaming a + test on a "poppy-seed" ( QE ll ), or + glaucine tests on the "shavings" is just searching for "plausible deniability ? and a CYA (lawyer advised answer)

    I hope Johnson's lawyer gets a answer ?? " Inquiring minds want to know " ?

    I think Lord Sebastian Coe ( IAAF ) might find the answer interesting also ?

    IMHO
    R DuCHARME

  2. #2
    Member Gelding richard1955 will become famous soon enough
    Real Name
    richard ducharme
    Posts
    66
    ONLY in NY ? I highly doubt that ? Where are the GLAUCINE results from other states, Canada, or Europe ?

    "shavings" are used a LOT more places than NY ? Did any other states even "test" for glaucine during this same period ?And have there been any +'s SINCE this "rash" of +'s first appeared ?

    Trainer's certainly haven't stopped using shavings for bedding ? OR did those trainers (and vets) simply "get wise" when NY started testing for it ? and changed their pre-race "meds" list

    I don't think "trees" have changed that much ??

    What about that "high tech" lab in Hong Kong ? Do they have a glaucine "problem" there ? or Australia and NZ ? are their
    trees different ?

    Coming up with a CYA answer " It must have been the shavings " just provides a excuse to HIDE behind ? Does anyone really
    believe this problem has "suddenly" appeared after a couple hundred years of using shavings ?

    I guess Dan Patch and Greyhound were "dopers" ?

    IMHO

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts