Having read what I consider a very long limb in the odds and evens thread I really think it fruitless to continue with you Dot. A long limb again to reference what I said regarding the need for clear policy change to implement more severe penalties and the inference I'd only like drivers to get a tap on the wrist.
I'm not sure if it's selective quoting (certainly not my intent) if I have agreed there was interference. Is it not simply a case of not needing to quote that part?
I'm bamboozled. Are you saying the driver, in saying poking through from the 2nd row meant the 7 was poking through in the peg line, therefore my maths is out because the 6 would have needed to drop down one more position? Perhaps irrelevant anyway, he was pinged for not being clear irrespective of one out, partially one out or on the rails. Dealt with under the first turn policy which if I remember correctly is from mobile release to the end of the first turn. Once again would need a clear policy change to deal with it differently. Allow me to imagine once again. If a pro driver was the first to be dealt with differently under this current policy, I'd borrow to bet they'd be off to appeal. Can see Damian Sheales rubbing his hands together, oops, can imagine him rubbing his hands.
Am surprised you think it more immediately obvious with an owner driver. Perhaps I've been tainted by past indiscretions from all types of drivers.
Making it clear once again, it doesn't mean I wouldn't support harsher penalties for any driver if the policy was changed.
You initially said the HRA replay didn't show any of the first interference Dot.