Flashing. Hi
have you read the decision on the penalties at www.hrnz.co.nz
In there the background to how the no defence rule came about.
A give and take.
Take away the defence, create a new rule with much lighter penalties.
FYI..I know that some people think I have dealings with the JCA i.e. insider
But No...I am a trainer, owner and breeder in that order.
In my spare time I study the laws in NZ as they apply to racing, the inner workings of the judicial system, and all cases.
I live with these rules, They are part of my life and should I ever need to I hope to have all the ins and outs to defend myself
This is a case I have studied closely. My personal views I still hold close to my chest and may surprise some.
ight through the many posts I have simply tried to explain how things work in NZ for us Licence holders.
The rule as it now stands is regarded by many as a protection.
Most drug cases in NZ are accidental with no malice intent.
This rule suits many as they are unable to explain events that have obviously happened through some oversight or whatever.
This rule covers these events and provides a wakeup call to transgressors.
For other serious transgressors there is another rule with much heavier penalties.
Trainers plead guilty as they are responsible for all that happens in their stable and staff.
It's the cheapest way out..Take the rap and get on with it...eh.