Reply With QuoteHard to believe it's the same Solda that was run down by Scandalman at Newcastle !
Take the time to watch the replay of Smolda winning the Emerald Final at Cambridge yesterday, especially the contempt he showed for the opposition from the home corner.
Breathtaking!!!
http://www.harnesslink.com/www/Article.cgi?ID=98058
Hard to believe it's the same Solda that was run down by Scandalman at Newcastle !
Geez Lenny your a bit harsh. Smolda sat in the death for most of that trip over 2550, they ran about 1:58 and Scandalman sat last off the speed, launched and got the one/one at a crucial stage before finally beating Smolda by about a metre. One of those races where it all just fell into place for one of them while the other did all the work. In the years to come I think you will see just how superior Smolda will be to Scandalman. (And I was on Smolda at Newcastle)
Last edited by broncobrad; 06-04-2012 at 07:48 PM. Reason: grammer and readability
I think not.On Saturday he didn't just sit parked,he absolutely smashed a Group 1 field,treating them with utter contempt ,broke the heart of a derby winner in the process,in NZ record time and won running away.
Call me a cynic but NSW has the toughest drug testing in harness racing in this part of the world doesn't it?
Don't have a go at me for being negative - the results of increased testing speaks for itself. Industry shoots itself in the foot far better than a nobody like me could do.
Having said that.....nobody can argue with Mark Purdon's eye for horseflesh.....bought 4 horses from the APG sale in 2010 and 3 of them turn out to be Mr Nickel, Fly Like An Eagle, and Smolda. Unbelievable.
...better than the way in which you read a race.
That was won and lost at the start when McFarlane held with Ideal Scott and the sectionals once again tell the story. The closer they got to the wire the slower they became. In a 1:52 & a piece NZ Record the closing Q. went by in 29 & a bit. Doesn't that tell you fellas anything at all? That's not winning by running away Lenny, that was winning by the rest of the field dropping off. There is a difference.
Superb drive by Purdon, he sent Smolda down the road & gave him his chance to be the Jewels Champion. The horse is a high speed stayer & he was driven accordingly. It's very poor form for anyone to suggest there was anything nefarious involved. That was a good old fashioned knock 'em down, drag 'em out front end battle, plain and simple. I'd have loved to have seen JD's horse win it but that aside, a terrific spectacle. Handlebars down, pin the ears back and away we go.
Thanks Jaimie for spelling it out as I too saw it or how it actually was.
Let me be generous by not reading between the lines of this posting.Originally Posted by little fish
Suffice to say that NSW has a very long way to go to match the drug testing regime of the NZ RIU and especially on big days like this.
All hands on deck to supervise...
Pre race blood testing ALL Runners.
Post race blood testing selected random runners.
Post race swabs of first 2 home all races.
That comes after out of competition testing all runners often more than once in the weeks leading up to the event.
So surely you agree Lenny, it was a super performance. They weren't slouches that he crushed.
Never for a moment suggested anything untoward.To imply that Smolda's win was because the others were stopping quicker is to not understand the essence of racing.Horses (or athletes for that matter) win because they run faster for longer than their opponents.You win "running away" even if you finish off in 32 so long as your opposition is finishing in 32.5.
Posting Permissions