That's correct leigh
The Hrv want a heftier suspension for these two individuals. It was the the Rad who imposed the insufficient suspension. I understand HRV are appealing the leniancy. Anyone can correct me if i'm wrong.
Last edited by teecee; 03-17-2014 at 04:26 PM. Reason: quote deleted
That's correct leigh
For clarification.
http://www.hrv.org.au/hrv/index.cfm/...b-information/
At last some common sense into the argument rather than blaming Anderson and HRV for everything.
https://soundcloud.com/rsn-racing/john-anderson-hrv-ceo
this link was on RSN lastweek it may answer a few reasons why the stay was granted.
Any chance of a summary David as I am a deaf old bugger?
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
basiciallly JA wanted them to appeal so that the stewards will be asking to try increase the sentance as JA said they have the ryt of appeal as do the stewards if the douglass team dosnt appeal to vcat the hrv would be appealing the sentance if u can listen to it its quite interesting.
I dont think its a strange coincidence but i know what you mean
This topic has gone very very quite??? You watch these two get off in the two weeks time
Hope your wrong Jax, From what JA said in the interview, Their both looking at 15 months. This would seem more realistic and it will be very interesting because a lot of people are watching this one intensely.