Perception, perception, perception. Poor old harness racing has had that albatross around its neck for decades. It wasn't known as the 'Red Hots' because of the horses internal temperature. There will always be that hangover of years gone by when rigging and rorting was rampant...but all three codes have endured massive cases of proven criminality activity, but racing still exists. There really should be disclaimers printed on all form guides stating that punting should occur at own risk because there maybe activities occurring contrary to the rules of racing that may be conceived as contravening fair play. NO REFUNDS APPLY, BETTING IS STUPID BEHAVIOUR. In my own mind I am confident that HRNSW have been and are presently doing the best they can to protect punters and sports participants from those who do not act in the best interests of the sport. Regular posters know I am more than happy to point out driving efforts that would appear to leave a lot to be desired. For the last almost twelve months HRNSW have undergone a transformation, a steep learning curve. They have really taken a good hard look at its business and made tough decisions. The substances being found in swabs and subsequent action being taken is heartening, although I think the penaltys in some cases are paltry. But it is a good start.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenem
Inspire confidence in the sport and it can only grow. Team driving has been hotly debated on the forum in the past and like most, I agree would be hard to prove. The trainer still has to do the right thing by the owners if he wants to keep the horses. Admittedly, what may look bad may well be team driving or it may just be circumstances of a race panning out badly for a stablemate whilst the other stablemate gets all the breaks. Maybe this topic could be looked at in the future after HRNSW has put all this other crap to bed.
