They must think the horse should get barred from racing altogether do they ?
Printable View
No but one who does follow sport a bit said hasnt been stood down at all and DID have a positive i know he has appealed and appealed and i think now of to the courts, same guy pointed out Raglan has a positive and enquiry pending but is going around to.
To put these worries to rest would have been quite easy really just announce that all runners would be pre race swabbed and post race swabbed and let the nation know about it..The last thing we want or need is another repeat of last year.
I'm pretty sure a driver isn't allowed in the betting area until all his engagement's have been fulfilled on the night .
We set a horse up for a win she paid 200+ for the win on the tote and 10's with the bookies the driver did all the fast work prior to the race and when asked why he didn't have a bet on her or his family his reply was
"we didn't want to shorten your price on her " I was disappointed he didn't have some on. This is a driver you can trust it's a pity their aren't more out there like it .
Yes but why do they think the horse should be penalised ? They didn't sting themselves .
After the Raglin positive any horse that is stood down after a positive should be cleared to race once it has a clear test. I always thought the stand down thing was to make shore the trainer turns up to the enquiry.