Printable View
Would still compare for both. Current wagering will reflect future prizemoney.Quote:
Originally Posted by Messenger
Quick search says US wage growth 5%. So guess through that market share type lense its only a very minor downturn however the wage growth is irrelevant when looking through the lense of expenses of the industry. If costs are rising 8% and wagering only up 4% thats still a chunk of higher expenses without the income to match.
No, what I was meaning in regards to wage growth is in terms of household income. If peoples' expenses are increasing by 8% but their wages are not, then it is unlikely they are going to wager as much. If inflation is +8% (cost of living) and wage growth +5% then I think the US industry should probably be reasonably happy with an increase in turnover of 4.2%
Yes I get that hence the viewing from lense of market share comment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Messenger
However for raceclubs and associations future survival they are still down 3% real inflated adjusted income and up 8% expenses.
You can take some positive out of wagering staying consistent with wage growth and being better with disposable income, but at the end of the day hanging your hat on that wont pay the bills.
Inflation not the fault of the sport, but its not good reading for financial viability of the sport.
Sure it is not a 'metro' meet and there is even another meet on at Mildura
BUT
$4,500 races at our metro track (Melton is that) on a Friday night
FEELS WRONG
https://www.harness.org.au/racing/fi...s/?mc=MX140723
(only 2 of 10 races But it still feels wrong)
These races, along with stakemoney for unplaced horses, just reward mediocrity and diminish returns for the better performed horses. In turn, that diminishes the punting pool. I confess to be just shooting from the hip with the last statement as I haven't researched it. i guess if a well-proven horse snuck its way into a $4,500 race it might attract some big wagers but it would also shrink the size of the pool due to nobody wanting to punt on its opponents.
I think I have said it before, but these lesser races were once the domain of non-TAB picnic clubs. They were a good thing for advancing horses, educating young stock while paying for some feed and a good, social occasion. All of this was flushed down the river when HRV, in its unquestionable wisdom, determined all its races would be TAB-covered events. The minimum stake for these has risen from $3,000 to $4,500 over the years but, seemingly to the detriment of the minimum country stakes.
How many years have we been racing for $7,000 now in Victoria? Seven or eight is my rough guess.
If you are wondering why we are behind the other codes for turnover
Tomorrow in Australia there are
15 Thoroughbred tote meetings
8 Greyhound tote meetings
3 Harness tote meetings
We are clearly a 'boutique' industry
Most of us rusted on harness people still know the champions going around in the gallops
My 30's son-in-law makes his living out the gallops, he used to work for a big betting agency but has gone out on his own - so he is a serious racing person.
I brought up Leap To Fame (going to talk about his brother beat him ...) - He has never heard of Leap To Fame
Far out - we have to throw heaps of money at regaining a profile if we are to be anything other than 'boutique' and irrelevant to anybody other than rusted ons
Shocking if it is true, according to PP this is why NZ standardbred mares (especially in foal) are being sold to China
28 horses, ALL fillies and mares, exported to China in the past month according to the Exported Horses report from the HRNZ website.
It is true, why else would they be air- freighting standardbred mares into China? And broodmares, when there is no racing?
Edit: I see you posted elsewhere about this Kev. Ill keep this post up but will keep my conversation to the other thread
Not sure where to put this but I was looking up my colt's full sister on HRNZ having decided to reach out to the owners to buy her. Noticed she's been exported... to China. 27 in total were exported to China in July (ALL were mares 3yo-11yo), in comparison 29 were exported to Australia with just 1 to the USA. I'm a little concerned about this - have read that it's a scam and the horses are put in foal and foals aborted so they can harvest the placenta for face creams. Surely... surely that can't be right. also been told that they race them there under saddle but wouldn't explain why theyre buying older broodmares. Any insights?
Note: This post was moved by Moderator Messenger