Dominatin

[candykisses]

Oh Greg,Thanku!!!!!
Aussiebrenno initially raised the Kerryn stat but funny enough the LM knockers who hang a man without a trial, had NO comment on that.
Thanku for providing real proof stats from that website, maybe, but unlikely, some may start to think this apparent domination does actually stem from as Craig put it so well, the Tall Poppy Syndrome.
We now need a thread for each of the above successful Trainers for the LM haters to accuse them of being drug cheats.

Also by the way would love to get a link put on here to the actual races, horses names and dates on the harness.org website where we can all b shown proof of horses who have recently improved by "50-100metres in a matter of a few weeks", apparently Cassie knows examples of this....................

HI Greg and Ash

I thought you might have had enough of producing those pointless starters to runners statistics when it was shown to not be a true indication of Luke's record .
So just for you both once again I 'll say it a little sssslllllloooowwwweeeeerrrrrr.

i.e. last friday at menangle Luke had 10 runners for 5 winners Using your starters to winners stats Greg thats 50%
Now here's the true stats Luke had runners in 5 races for 5 winners that gentleman is 100%

The FactLuke usually has multiple runners ( 2 and 3 )will always water down his starters to winners figures '
were as the other trainers you are talking about seldom would have more than 1 runner per race
If you have 3 runners in a race(as Luke often does and you win with 1 of them it will still only give you a 33.3% starters to winners ratio.
Are you getting the Idea Boy's or would you like me to draw you a picture??

Sorry Ash I know you got a bit excited there ,but keep up the good work mate.

Cheers Cassie