http://www.trotstv.com.au/?id=6716Originally Posted by mightymo
not so apparently Harvey, the "enzymatic activity" appears to have happened in Mach Wiper's sample only, which of course is why HRNSW had no option but to not contest the appeal. The continuing rise in the levels of boldenone in the "B" sample whilst in storage and then tested at the Hong Kong lab have smarter people than us baffled, Again this is why HRNSW had to take the action they have, and my congratulations to all involved, that is the way our justice system is meant to work..if there is doubt then the presumption of innocence stands.
Reply With Quote