Hey Bailey, I can't buy that one. Treating horses regularly with arsenic was extremely common place in years gone by and its therapeutic value in smaller doses cannot be denied. Performance enhancing? Probably. I can't deny that environmental factors may not be a possible contributing factor, but more than likely it is because of the human application which has exceeded the acceptable levels. I don't think Butt appealed did he?

As the following article infers, Harry Telford was not adverse to its use http://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-06-1...ntists/2477188

It just depends on which scientist you choose to side with http://www.abc.net.au/science/articl...11/2896059.htm