
Originally Posted by
Danno
I reckon you slotted that one in just before going "ni ni's" Jamie, probably on a bit of a loose rein too, if my guess is correct.
you really shouldn't categorise people mate just because they don't happen to agree with you, there has been a fair bit said on another thtread about another subject, but to put a few of us in an "outrage" basket, simply because we have had similar views quite different to your own is, IMO getting a bit personal.
Just for the record, no, I don't think in this particular case, the penalty appears to fit the situation, but I wasn't privvy to the details of the enquiry, were you? The trainer's evidence in this case would have been critical to the charge laid and obviously so would the evidence put forward by both the drivers, did you sit through that?
On face value, the incident looked quite suss and at least an enquiry was held, charges laid and a penalty imposed. All without hard evidence like a positive swab, the like of which you have been defending, so if there are any inconsistencies here Triple they are yours by my reckoning.
Cheers,
Dan