Quote Originally Posted by Boydy View Post
You obviously miss the point Marty he still covered the distance in 1:50.

Plenty of horses take a sit of a hot speed and can't run 1:50 he could have won by a metre and gone 1:51.8
Thanku Boydy, its not that hard really...i understand partially his thoughts on why his opinion is what it is based on the way the race was run, but, yes the time is the time. He did run 1609, not 600...