The integrity departments need to find a way to fix the arsenic problem.
It is pointless testing for it if nobody can be found guilty on the basis that it cannot be excluded that the level of arsenic was not the result of the horse consuming wood from paddock fencing

I don't know what the benefits of arsenic are and whether it warrants a rule whereby the trainer is responsible for the stabling/fencing of a horse (the replacement of all treated pine poles?) but I am sick of reading the exact same ruling/excuse.

The latest charges:

http://www.harnesslink.com/Australia...ry---Ben-Yole-