Another one from the same source
http://www.harness.org.au/racing/fie...21#NRC21052107
Interesting to watch the neck of the leader on the pegs who seems to make room for the held up favourite to get out in the straight after his driver looks to the right but it is probably an illusion as the stewards didn’t see anything
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
And how did Kevin Pizzuto find so much improvement in Ready To Bloom in the space of a week after an ordinary 8th last week. So much so that he started in the red despite not having won for 2yrs
http://www.harness.org.au/racing/fie...21#MEC22062115
Once again no questions asked in the stewards report
Last edited by Messenger; 06-24-2021 at 05:30 PM.
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
And no pre-race blood test either. Backed into the red, nothing to see here! I see the trainer has already been charged in March for a positive to the same corticosteroid that Amanda Turnbull was outed for. Takes an extremely great trainer to produce a struggling plodder second up and pull of a plunge to win so easily after just 6 weeks in their care. Or not.
We sometimes think Victorian stewards QIP's are a token gesture but at least they are asking the question and confirming that they are seeing what punters are seeing
I think NSW stewards reports come out quickly because there is nothing in them!
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
NSW is a basketcase going backwards at a rate of knots and losing lifelong industry participants
The protest upheld in R2 at Shep tonight
The leader did hang out at the entrance to the straight but did he take the 2nd place-getter out?
Keep the replay running to see the head on. It is interesting to note that the 2nd place-getter seemed to have a tendency to run off itself
http://www.harness.org.au/racing/fie...21#SPC30062110
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
http://www.harness.org.au/racing/ste...l/?mc=BN131020
This is from Oct 13 last year R1 Bendigo
When considering the circumstances of the race and the statements of the driver, stewards did not feel the tactics adopted were so unreasonable as to warrant further action. A post-race veterinary examination was conducted on the gelding, with no obvious abnormalities detected. Stewards intend to analyse the wagering data of the event.
This is the Supplementary Report that covers Oct 13
http://www.harness.org.au/media-room...?news_id=45450
No mention of the wagering analysis
Where does one find the stewards decision on their analysis?
ps This is the race link
http://www.harness.org.au/racing/fie...20#BNC13102004
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
HRV Chairman of Stewards Brett Day was kind enough to supply me with an answer to the above.
If there were to be charges/follow up action due to wagering analysis we would find it in a Supplementary Report
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI