1700+ cases and not one of them returned a positive? Gives whole new meaning to the term "Free For All". Says from his vets records. HIS vet records or his VETS records?
http://www.paulickreport.com/news/th...ug-violations/
Yesterday I nearly posted that LM is our Pena, very very wrong about that one.
This link has the findings, once more Holy Shit.
http://www.racing.ny.gov/pdf/05_24_12_PenaNotice.pdf
Last edited by Starship Captain; 05-25-2012 at 11:22 AM.
1700+ cases and not one of them returned a positive? Gives whole new meaning to the term "Free For All". Says from his vets records. HIS vet records or his VETS records?
This bloke must be chemist. You were right not to post yesterday, no way you can compare except maybe in winning strike rates
WOW! You've missed your calling Lou. Forget about training horses. Go work for the Tobacco Industry.
Oh no!!!! Not another tall poppy?????
Someones gunna mention these were simply 1700 miscalculated dosages of therapeutic substances.....HaHaHaHaHaHaHaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No, no, no, Danno. The hook here in REALLY interesting.
From what I can gather there is not a single positive swab anywhere. What these represent is 1,700 instances of, for want of a better term 'retrospective violations' which are based not on the traditonal swabs but instead on what they believe to be medications administered by the Vet inside of the withdrawal periods using the Vet's own records of same. It's fascinating stuff, probably not so much so for old mate Lou however.
Cheers Jamie,
but I didn't think for one millisecond they waited for 1700 positives to oust him!just when you read the list of substances, many of them some people will claim to be therapeutic.
Danno these 1700 were all miscalculated therapeutic substances. They just miscalculated the day they could be administered on, oops!