NSW "Prizemoney!"

[trish]

http://www.harness.org.au/news-artic...?news_id=24421


THANK YOU JOHN.
What a great move by HRNSW, this is decent & fair.

Isn't this positive Jaimie.

[Triple V]

http://www.harness.org.au/news-artic...?news_id=24421


THANK YOU JOHN.
What a great move by HRNSW, this is decent & fair.

Isn't this positive Jaimie.

VVV- See #49

[kung fu man]

What was the anomaly i wonder?

[trish]

What was the anomaly i wonder?

“An anomaly had occurred with the scheduling of Secondary Meetings which required immediate attention"

Hi Warren, maybe this anomaly means that they might even look at back paying you. Maybe go & pick up those $100 notes. Hope so for your sake. After all it was only two meetings.

[djgood]

Didn't take long to screw the little bloke with the new handicapping the competitive stakes in the last at Newcastle is a farce

[djgood]

Original conditions for race -For horses which have had a minimum of 6 Australian starts & have an average individual mile rate of no better than 2.01 (over the last 6 starts) and assessed no better than C1.

[Triple V]

Original conditions for race -For horses which have had a minimum of 6 Australian starts & have an average individual mile rate of no better than 2.01 (over the last 6 starts) and assessed no better than C1.

VVV- Shit go that.

[Mark Croatto]

At least it was drawn with the C1s!

[Frano1982]

I'll be scratching my bloke...
It's a very disappointing situation when you think you're going to be in a race with horses around the same ability as your horse and then the power that be go and change it for a horse that's won 3 of his last 5 and last 3 starts ran 59, 56 and 56...
Competetive stakes apparently???

[kung fu man]

You should be let scratch from that without penalty if they changed the conditions to suit 1 horse