It appears that the Steward's appeal was taken into consideration and the Judge thought the penalty of 6 months was just and appropriate but mentioned that the 6 month penalty was by no means a ceiling for this type if offence.
Can the stewards take this further in regard to increasing the suspension? Afterall, they did appeal the leniency in the first place.
It appears that the Steward's appeal was taken into consideration and the Judge thought the penalty of 6 months was just and appropriate but mentioned that the 6 month penalty was by no means a ceiling for this type if offence.
Well said Brendan.
3 BTF your spray should be directed at an ineffective VCAT not HRV in this case.
It looks like its worse to abuse an official than lie to and decieve one, judging by the 9 months Ian Dornauf received. Go figure!!!!
Anyone know what douglas and anderson are doing on there holiday??
Darryl will be driving today, and John will probably be at HRV headquarters.
Jackson thanks you Leigh - NOT. Sad to think that covering up your crime pays - 6mths is nothing compared to the latest disqualifications
per un PUGNO di DOLLARI
Guys, while we all agree what they did was disgusting and should never happen again. Tying ourselves up in knots about it will not help. Yes I agree 6 months is not enough. But I am satisfied stewards and HRV did everything in their power to get a heavier sentence. And anyone saying different, is simply deluding themselves.