http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darbepoetin_alfa
Both ARANESP & CRESP are in this.
Cresp was approved in INDIA.
It sure does Viv, I've been in this game on & off for a long time & I have never seen it like this, the improvement shown in so many horses is terminal for the industry. One thing that really upsets us is the fact the authority aren't keeping us up to date with what they are doing to try & stop it, so you really don't know if there is any hope.
Last edited by trish; 08-08-2014 at 04:01 PM. Reason: spelling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darbepoetin_alfa
Both ARANESP & CRESP are in this.
Cresp was approved in INDIA.
Last edited by trish; 08-08-2014 at 04:09 PM. Reason: added
So does this mean that every trainer who dominates with horses from their stables automatically becomes suspicious? It is something that is always in the back of my mind and on occasions I have been proven right. The fact that a negative swab result has been returned does not necessarily remove the suspicion. However, you had better get used to it because I don't think any harness racing authority would allow anything that would portray them in a bad light.
However, you had better get used to it because I don't think any harness racing authority would allow anything that would portray them in a bad light.
Hi Ron, not sure what you mean by that last statement, it doesn't seem to make sense . We don't have to get used to anything, we don't need harness racing, harness racing NEEDS people like us.
There is no denying Viv's comments:
(Viv hope you don't mind that I put them in point form)
I fear that these points are right on the money. I have to believe that the stewards are doing everything within their power to catch the cheats (I am not implying anything other than my opinion). Authorities around the world have the same problem of chasing/catching up to drug cheats. What a waste of funds that could go into racing but have to be spent chasing the cheats. I wonder where the industry will be in 10 years time? I can not think of anything that has been a bigger threat to the survival of the industry. Sorry I think I'm just rambling, I just wanted to put it on paper..............
- Drugs will kill this industry.
- And they know the cheats are winning.
- Everytime they close one avenue off, the drug cheats find a new one.
- By the time the authorities get on top of that one, the drug cheats will be on to something else.
Most people are on the same page here. Look back over time of the stables that "dominated" for a period, many have more than question marks against them - positive swabs or not. My view is that administrators take the view that if they were ever able to get ahead of the game just once, they wouldn't go through with it - the damage they fear would be too great. I would counter that the damage being done at the moment will continue to erode the industry, the people that actually make it tick will walk away. The gentleman who taught me virtually everything I know about the sport and let me drive his horses at every opportunity is now a broken man and disillusioned with the sport. He's tasted the highs, but now mostly the lows. A man who despises drug cheats has over recent times lost a few north - where the horses have turned into lear jets. I know the horses well - but the ones racing now are not the same ones that he had. Somewhere in a thread I heard "Indian Herbs" mentioned - must be the new name, bottom line, whether it's EPO, Blue Magic, Aranesp, Cresp, Milkshakes, Cobalt and now Ice, (they are only the ones I am aware of in my lifetime) the chemists will always be ahead of the game. I am very cynical with regard to the current "dominators" that if I drew up a family tree of stables that I suspect aren't all 100% legit - in each case I can trace strong links back to the good old USA and if you follow my lead that we tend to lag 6-12 months or more behind them just check out where the sport is headed there.
Should we be thinking a bit wider with the fight against dopers?
I think so,some sports are now having "blood passports" where the swab is actually taken at a time when it is unlikely that the gear is being used.The blood profile subsequently gained then becomes the bench mark and if a subsequent swab shows a deviation from that norm it is incumbent on the "swabee" to explain what caused the deviation
Moves the onus of proof to where it should be. Discuss.
Hi Trish,
What I meant (and I'm probably being cynical) that if any major doping scandal arose it may not even see the light of day because harness racing authorities know it would be the end as far as the betting public are concerned. I found this out on a personal level training horses in the 80's all the honest trainers knew that we were not competing against the major stables on a level playing field but there was absolutely nothing we could do about it. It may be an overstatement, but I'm not so sure.
Last edited by Mighty Atom; 08-08-2014 at 09:26 PM.