Originally Posted by
Thevoiceofreason
I feel that there would have been an inquiry into the Bathurst race but I may be wrong.
To be honest we will never know because they are not the circumstances that eventuated. A good rule of thumb in these circumstances is if an impartial observer might think "whats going on here" that is when stewards should investigate, so what went on can be explained.
I think watching Bathurst it was easy to have that thought especially when the horses recent tactics are considered.
It will surprise many but personally I am not a fan of the COT rules all I have done in the past is say it should be applied consistently and I have any many debates on here with VVV as to that, so be clear I do not like the concept, having said that, I do think it is applied consistently.
I would be happy to offer an opinion on the two examples you have mentioned just list the races and I will have a look and give a view, in general terms though the COT rule and announcement is always accompanied by "if circumstances permit", for example if you are a leader going to take cover but still go forward you are not expected to run a 36 quarter if nothing challenges you for the lead just to get cover, likewise if you are going back and there is just no speed and you are caught 3 deep without cover and puling you would not be found in breach if you then went forward, as these are circumstances of the race and therefore it would be found circumstances did not permit the intended change.
There will be no need for VVV to remind me he found one or two examples where the stewards in NSW got the COT's wrong in July or August last year and as I said then from time to time they will make a blue or miss something but as punters we should be aware that can happen, we miss most winners most weeks,