In regard to the stewards reaching their findings, they would be derelict in their duty if they did not look at previous driving patterns of the horses concerned. But they should still remain open minded and COMPLETELY objective whilst inquiring into the original race that raised all the questions. Trent in my opinion was entitled to do as much as he did to repulse O'Sheas unacceptable challenge. O'Shea was the major contributor into the downfall of both horses that night and should have had much of the blame apportioned and penaltys directed at him. IMO stronger charges should have been laid but were not. ERGO the lack of faith the average punter has in the sport. ERGO the lack of credibility and integrity the sport has in the average punters mind. We are all waiting patiently for integrity to be applied in disqualifications/suspensions that are handed down, not raps over knuckles or inconsistent rulings or incorrect rulings full stop. In a couple of weeks time Lukes boldenone case comes up. It will be interesting to see how that pans out in light of the recent disqualification of Barry Lew...but I digress.

Formie says Trent has no case to answer, I too think he is blameless in this case and should have his appeal upheld. I originally did not think Rue should have been charged and was suprised he was. When I first saw it, all I could see was a short priced fav being murdered and its not a good look.

On the upside have to thank Steve for pointing out they were racing last night, would have missed it otherwise. Thought the Camper was nearly a moral because surely they were not going to take him on again. He got a comfy lead and had a nice kick left in him on the corner. Took $7.50 fixed odds (even tho' he finished up about $9 fixed odds but only paid about $5 on the tote). On the downside, Kenmore Stars got too many tricks in his locker to a be horse you could ever back with confidence again...I am sure his foodbill is paid for by the bookies, they must love him.