Hey Danno...You know I can't agree with you, only because your opinion on the possible outcome is the same as mine. It is a moot point because we will never know either way what the likely outcome would have been if he had gone early. Dan, I always value your opinion, like VVV I have learnt an awful lot in a pretty short time.
IMO it was an opportunity gone begging. Your opinion is he has done everything he possibly could to achieve the best possible position for a horse (possibly) short of a run. Am happy to leave it at that.
However, what I am absolutely delighted about is the stewards ACTUALLY ASKED THE SAME QUESTION as I did. Now that does give me confidence that The Blind Men From Alabama saw enough in the drive to pose the question. The explanation given by Caffyn was plausible, believable and the circumstantial evidence backs his case. So once again I am satisfied that the stipes have done their job to Nthhh degree and I can live with the fact that no further correspondence needs to be entered into on this drive.
Tell you what tho' Dan, we bloody punters are just as integral a part in the sport as the rest of the owners, trainers, drivers, breeders, administration and the bloke on the gate. We also just want a fair go.
The stewards report is a good read for a change
http://www.harness.org.au/stewards-r...fm?mc=BK070512