Bill you may be able to answer these, why was Painting charged $400 per occasion he backed his own horse and Jones charged $500 when Jones did it less frequently?

Also 6 months disqualification seems awfully steep when you actually break down the bets. Sure the wrong thing has been done but looking at the bets it is blatantly obvious that Jackson was hardly trying to pull off the worlds greatest rort. His bets totaled next to nothing and only show us that he can't pick a winner. Why the harshness? Was there not a case in the last couple of years in Vic of a well known driver copping around 3 months suspension for a very similar act?

This just all seems way way out of proportion.