
Originally Posted by
The Big Mile
Eliteblood do you really think the impact of the NBCS will be marginal? If this is the case, then why are we bothering going down this path?
If what you are saying here is true, then the scheme has failed abysmally. The idea is to encourage breeding through NBCS credits, accumulated through a prolonged track career. Maybe this is why the credits cannot be allocated to the owner for the exact reason you mentioned.
The net benefit of the scheme is to pump an additional $2.2 million into service fees. This is where it will end up. How much of that overlaps (in terms of mares whom accumulated credits but would have been bred with anyway) well that is anyones guess and no one will ever know the actual answer, even after looking back on data, let alone looking forward.
This is maybe why credits need to be allocated to lower echelon races. This then will contradict with wanting to ensure improvement of the breed as the scheme effectively entices the quality to be diluted simply to get more foals on the ground. I can see how that is problematic.
I do feel though that to suggest there will be marginal benefit to stallion owners overall from the scheme is a bit short of the mark.