Anyone know the outcome?
surely it should be over by now?
15mg
SU was 25mg
Anyone know the outcome?
surely it should be over by now?
I believe the enquiry is still continuing , no resolution at this stage.
I'm really impressed with how the defence are running their case, it appears they are a fighting chance (as they should be IMHO). Good luck Lance, I'm cheering you on.
Squire and Hall became involved in the Gardner cross-examination, which drew the revelation there was potential for contamination due to "instrumental carry-over".
Squire: "Are you suggesting that the trace levels (of DMSO) may have got there as a result of the testing process?"
Gardner: "That's a possibility."
Grierson, who has 25 years experience as a racecourse vet, came under intense questioning from Thomas. She noted he made two errors in the swabbing process, one in which he omitted a digit on the swab card identification number, and another when he signed his name on the line marked: steward. "I was technically a steward," he replied.
Common sense (law) prevails?
[VVV] That doesn't make any sense to me at all TST. In fact it is completely wrong.
Last time I checked...which wasn't too long ago btw given the amount of Coffee I've banged down today, urine is in fact a liquid...therefore the presence of any substance would not be measured in mg's. It would be measured in ppm's...just as TC02's are measured in mmol's & not mg's. I think you're just making mischief.
Last edited by triplev123; 08-24-2011 at 09:57 PM. Reason: experienced a chemistry prompted epiphany
Just found this...
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226121404170
think sushi may be right VVV, read the story on harness link.
Rule 1004(8) provides for the mandatory disqualification of a horse presented to race when a prohibited substance has been detected.
SU HAS to the lose the race
wonder why they couldnt find an expert witness in nz to support their case? does anyone know the guy from kentucky?
Last edited by thesushitrain; 08-25-2011 at 01:18 PM.