Originally Posted by
Danno
Dear Jamie,
as usual you pick one line of a contribution and make what you can of it, ho f...ing hum. the general thrust of the original post was that Lance Armstrong, a VERY successful cheat has been thrown out of his sport/industry because the people running that sport internationally have enough evidence to say to a "legend"... "rack off we dont want anything to do with you anymore".
But I'm sorry Jamie for being so inadequate once again to completely misunderstand the intention/thrust that YOU had posted.
Did you agree or not with Lance Armstrong's expulsion from his sport?
do you agree or not that punters would like to be on a certainty at juicy odds?
do you agree or not people react emotionally rather that rationally when they have "done they're dough"?
Do you honestly, really think that the rules of our game are shaped purely to maximise government returns? Are you that mercenary/free market orientated to think there is absolutely no moral fibre whatsoever in our political system?
Our judicial system is designed to deliver fair outcomes....sometimes it gets it right sometimes it doesn't, thats life! because as clever as we are we cannot predict the future and every different situation/scenario.
It's very easy to throw crap at others for their mistakes or inadequacies, and you are very good at that.
Cheers,
Dan