Quote Originally Posted by A BIT DUSTY View Post
BRENDAN HAVE YOU LOST THE F----- PLOT D.Wilson was 900 klms away D thomas's mother was living on the same property working with the horses , the fact that one was a paid employee and the other was not has got F all to do with a trainer presenting a horse to race free of a prohibited substance , it is total responsibility of the trainer that is why I was bemoaning the lack of consistency. D. Smith happens to train one of Australia's best galloping sprinters Atomic Force I'm sorry for not making this clearer, I took it for granted that most people with any currant sporting knowledge would have known this. Obviously the reference was a comparison to Gai Waterhouse getting off.

Your comments re: A stable employees paid to do stuff by Wilson, Wilson get's suspended . D. Thomas goes positive for bute his mother Not an employee of the trainer .

Using your logic Brendan HOW do you Explain the Waterhouse ( paid employee) get's off. D Smith ( non payed father ) get's suspended. Please don't give me the different codes thing because we are under the same legal system in Australia.
Without knowing the cases in specific law isn't a science experiment where you have a dependent variable and an independent variable. In law cases there are many variables you can't just take one similarity between the case and say the rulings weren't consistent.

The different codes do have different rules btw.